April 30: Final tourist day in Japan
May. 2nd, 2012 10:14 amToday was our day to fit in a few final things before leaving, without quite the same rapid pace as in previous days. Thus, we decided to aim for one tourist site or shrine, then conclude with a relaxing walk (garden or river) to wind down.
We shared breakfast with two young American men, one who came here on a Fullbright scholarship and decided to stay and work as a kindergarten English teacher and the other his friend, just visiting before beginning a career as a physiotherapist. Interesting guys, and one of the places they mentioned that they were considering visiting that day was the Fushimi-Inari Taisha temple complex. This one is was sufficiently different from the other complexes we’ve visited that we thought it would be a good choice. There were three main differences from previous places:
First and very obviously, the complex is dedicated to the fox (kitsune), who is a servant of Inari, god of the rice harvest (and thus, by a logical extension given the importance of rice in Japanese culture, god of business success). I haven’t mentioned rice before, but it’s worth mentioning in this context because most of the Japanese landscape is dominated by rice paddies. It sometimes seemed that every flat space (and many steep spaces after terracing) was covered by rice paddies, often interspersed with small kitchen gardens. Foxes are an equivocal creature in Japanese mythology, since they combine aspects of trickster gods like Coyote and some aspects of western demons (i.e., they can possess humans). They’re not evil as such, but not necessarily spirits whose attention you want to attract either. At this shrine, some of the foxes carry a key in their mouth (to the granary where rice is stored) and some carry a ball (as in Chinese mythology, representing the demon’s power and possibly its soul); the two are usually paired.
The second unusual aspect is that this complex is covered by torii. Most temples and shrines have a single one of these gateways at each entrance, representing a transition from the profane or mundane outer world to the sacred or divine world of the temple, but the Inari shrine has hundreds of them. There are actual corridors of torii where you can walk for 5 minutes before reaching the end. In between stretches of torii-lined pathways, there are many small fox shrines. Each typically has a large (a couple feet) fox sculpture on each side. Some have additional small fox sculptures (an inch or two in size) as well as the usual shrine offerings, such as lit candles or incense and bowls of sake. There’s no English information on why there are so many torii or how each shrine differs from the dozens of others. Again, this is one of those places where it would help to have a local guide who not only understands the history but who can also read the signs and tell you what each one says, and thus its meaning within the overall context. A little googling suggests that the multiple torii result from donations by businessmen who believe their prayers were answered by Inari. Judging by the number and size of the major torii, Inari was singlehandedly responsible for Japan’s amazing economic success in the past century. But there are also many smaller torii leaning against shrines throughout the complex for lesser successes.
The third difference was that this was a woodland temple. Although all other shrines that we visited had significant garden areas and beautifully laid out “nature” areas, these were clearly domesticated: gardens, not natural. The Inari shrine was surrounded by woodland, and although there were signs of management here and there, particularly in terms of erosion control structures in the streams, the woods remained largely in their natural condition and that was the overall impression I took away from this temple. I love Japanese parks and gardens for their esthetic qualities, but it’s also nice to see what is essentially unadorned nature. There’s very little of that in urban areas of Japan, since the islands are dominated by mountainous areas, making all relatively flat land doubly precious for urban and agricultural development. The unfortunate side effect is that it can be difficult to find an unobstructed view of nature in many parts of Japan.
We walked most of the way to the end of the complex, then started getting hungry and headed back to the small urban area by the train station. The station is surrounded by the usual cluster of businesses that have gathered to extract money from tourists, domestic and foreign, but one nice thing about Japan is that the merchants are much lower key than in many other countries we’ve visited; there are eager invitations to come see their wares, but little or no hard sell. Among the shops we found a reasonably priced noodle restaurant, where we both had a donburi lunch: that’s basically a bowl of rice, often with a lightly scrambled egg dumped atop the rice (as in my case) and with miscellaneous other good stuff such as shallots or nori thrown in. The protein in that other stuff was roast duck for me, and eel for Shoshanna. We also ordered the “set” (set meal), which came with a huge bowl of udon noodles in savory broth; these are the thick, chewy kind rather than the thinner ramen or soba (buckwheat) noodles. We knew they’d be included in the set, but hadn’t realized how many we’d get. It was all lovely, but there was so much food that it ruined my appetite for grazing later in the day. I reluctantly passed up many enticing snacks along the way because of the lingering fullness from lunch and the desire to leave some room for dinner.
We decided to end our vacation with a stroll along the “walk of philosophy”, which runs through an older part of town a few blocks east of Yonbanchi. The walk runs alongside a small urbanized river, the water being about 10 feet across and running in a stone- or concrete-lined channel. Periodically, narrow stone bridges span the river to connect neighborhoods on opposite sides of the river, and there are many drainage channels that funnel water around the houses and into the river. The buildings on either side of the river aren’t particularly antique, but they are in generally good shape and some are sufficiently old to give a pleasantly antique feel. The river is lined with old trees and flowering plants, so it’s a shady, quiet, peaceful place to wander or to sit and philosophize. Several souvenir shops and restaurants have sprung up alongside the river to take advantage of tourists and local philosophers, and you can take a break from nature if so desired or pause to contemplate nature while sipping tea and nibbling a meal or snacks.
There were some really nice handicrafts, but also some cutesy stuff; the latter included a shop that was all about things cat-related (e.g., paintings, purses, jewelry, scarves) and a shop we didn’t look into, but that had a family of teddy bears sitting together beside the river, holding a fishing rod. We also came across a real fisherman, and looking closer, we noticed that there were some seriously big carp in the river (nearly 2 feet long in some cases). They were dark enough to be nearly invisible while in the shadows cast by the running water, but once you knew where to look and what to look for (specifically, the ripple created by their dorsal fin), they were easy to spot. Amusingly, we crossed paths with the same couple who’d stayed in the room next door at the temple earlier in our stay in Kyoto. We didn’t actually get to see them while we were there (our waking schedules didn’t overlap), but their voices were distinctive enough to make identification easy, and I recognized the guy’s shoes. (In Japan, shoes are left outside your room, and this guy had Really Big Feet.)
We briefly considered going to a restaurant called “Grotto” for dinner. Easiest way to describe this restaurant is that it’s like a tapas place but with a set menu, which is to say they serve a series of small dishes over the course of a few hours, giving you a wide variety of types of Japanese food to sample; I counted more than a dozen items on the set menu. However, it seemed likely to be a ton of food (more than either of us could eat after such a huge lunch), and at nearly $60 per person, it was quite a bit more expensive than we wanted. Instead, we returned to Goya and had another really good meal. My choice was a “chample”, which is a kind of Okinawan hash made of various veggies (including bitter melon), scrambled eggs, and tofu. It was topped with bonito flakes (dried shaved tuna), which I’m not fond of, so I gave most of it to Shoshanna. She had a rice dish with simmered pork. Both yummy!
We shared breakfast with two young American men, one who came here on a Fullbright scholarship and decided to stay and work as a kindergarten English teacher and the other his friend, just visiting before beginning a career as a physiotherapist. Interesting guys, and one of the places they mentioned that they were considering visiting that day was the Fushimi-Inari Taisha temple complex. This one is was sufficiently different from the other complexes we’ve visited that we thought it would be a good choice. There were three main differences from previous places:
First and very obviously, the complex is dedicated to the fox (kitsune), who is a servant of Inari, god of the rice harvest (and thus, by a logical extension given the importance of rice in Japanese culture, god of business success). I haven’t mentioned rice before, but it’s worth mentioning in this context because most of the Japanese landscape is dominated by rice paddies. It sometimes seemed that every flat space (and many steep spaces after terracing) was covered by rice paddies, often interspersed with small kitchen gardens. Foxes are an equivocal creature in Japanese mythology, since they combine aspects of trickster gods like Coyote and some aspects of western demons (i.e., they can possess humans). They’re not evil as such, but not necessarily spirits whose attention you want to attract either. At this shrine, some of the foxes carry a key in their mouth (to the granary where rice is stored) and some carry a ball (as in Chinese mythology, representing the demon’s power and possibly its soul); the two are usually paired.
The second unusual aspect is that this complex is covered by torii. Most temples and shrines have a single one of these gateways at each entrance, representing a transition from the profane or mundane outer world to the sacred or divine world of the temple, but the Inari shrine has hundreds of them. There are actual corridors of torii where you can walk for 5 minutes before reaching the end. In between stretches of torii-lined pathways, there are many small fox shrines. Each typically has a large (a couple feet) fox sculpture on each side. Some have additional small fox sculptures (an inch or two in size) as well as the usual shrine offerings, such as lit candles or incense and bowls of sake. There’s no English information on why there are so many torii or how each shrine differs from the dozens of others. Again, this is one of those places where it would help to have a local guide who not only understands the history but who can also read the signs and tell you what each one says, and thus its meaning within the overall context. A little googling suggests that the multiple torii result from donations by businessmen who believe their prayers were answered by Inari. Judging by the number and size of the major torii, Inari was singlehandedly responsible for Japan’s amazing economic success in the past century. But there are also many smaller torii leaning against shrines throughout the complex for lesser successes.
The third difference was that this was a woodland temple. Although all other shrines that we visited had significant garden areas and beautifully laid out “nature” areas, these were clearly domesticated: gardens, not natural. The Inari shrine was surrounded by woodland, and although there were signs of management here and there, particularly in terms of erosion control structures in the streams, the woods remained largely in their natural condition and that was the overall impression I took away from this temple. I love Japanese parks and gardens for their esthetic qualities, but it’s also nice to see what is essentially unadorned nature. There’s very little of that in urban areas of Japan, since the islands are dominated by mountainous areas, making all relatively flat land doubly precious for urban and agricultural development. The unfortunate side effect is that it can be difficult to find an unobstructed view of nature in many parts of Japan.
We walked most of the way to the end of the complex, then started getting hungry and headed back to the small urban area by the train station. The station is surrounded by the usual cluster of businesses that have gathered to extract money from tourists, domestic and foreign, but one nice thing about Japan is that the merchants are much lower key than in many other countries we’ve visited; there are eager invitations to come see their wares, but little or no hard sell. Among the shops we found a reasonably priced noodle restaurant, where we both had a donburi lunch: that’s basically a bowl of rice, often with a lightly scrambled egg dumped atop the rice (as in my case) and with miscellaneous other good stuff such as shallots or nori thrown in. The protein in that other stuff was roast duck for me, and eel for Shoshanna. We also ordered the “set” (set meal), which came with a huge bowl of udon noodles in savory broth; these are the thick, chewy kind rather than the thinner ramen or soba (buckwheat) noodles. We knew they’d be included in the set, but hadn’t realized how many we’d get. It was all lovely, but there was so much food that it ruined my appetite for grazing later in the day. I reluctantly passed up many enticing snacks along the way because of the lingering fullness from lunch and the desire to leave some room for dinner.
We decided to end our vacation with a stroll along the “walk of philosophy”, which runs through an older part of town a few blocks east of Yonbanchi. The walk runs alongside a small urbanized river, the water being about 10 feet across and running in a stone- or concrete-lined channel. Periodically, narrow stone bridges span the river to connect neighborhoods on opposite sides of the river, and there are many drainage channels that funnel water around the houses and into the river. The buildings on either side of the river aren’t particularly antique, but they are in generally good shape and some are sufficiently old to give a pleasantly antique feel. The river is lined with old trees and flowering plants, so it’s a shady, quiet, peaceful place to wander or to sit and philosophize. Several souvenir shops and restaurants have sprung up alongside the river to take advantage of tourists and local philosophers, and you can take a break from nature if so desired or pause to contemplate nature while sipping tea and nibbling a meal or snacks.
There were some really nice handicrafts, but also some cutesy stuff; the latter included a shop that was all about things cat-related (e.g., paintings, purses, jewelry, scarves) and a shop we didn’t look into, but that had a family of teddy bears sitting together beside the river, holding a fishing rod. We also came across a real fisherman, and looking closer, we noticed that there were some seriously big carp in the river (nearly 2 feet long in some cases). They were dark enough to be nearly invisible while in the shadows cast by the running water, but once you knew where to look and what to look for (specifically, the ripple created by their dorsal fin), they were easy to spot. Amusingly, we crossed paths with the same couple who’d stayed in the room next door at the temple earlier in our stay in Kyoto. We didn’t actually get to see them while we were there (our waking schedules didn’t overlap), but their voices were distinctive enough to make identification easy, and I recognized the guy’s shoes. (In Japan, shoes are left outside your room, and this guy had Really Big Feet.)
We briefly considered going to a restaurant called “Grotto” for dinner. Easiest way to describe this restaurant is that it’s like a tapas place but with a set menu, which is to say they serve a series of small dishes over the course of a few hours, giving you a wide variety of types of Japanese food to sample; I counted more than a dozen items on the set menu. However, it seemed likely to be a ton of food (more than either of us could eat after such a huge lunch), and at nearly $60 per person, it was quite a bit more expensive than we wanted. Instead, we returned to Goya and had another really good meal. My choice was a “chample”, which is a kind of Okinawan hash made of various veggies (including bitter melon), scrambled eggs, and tofu. It was topped with bonito flakes (dried shaved tuna), which I’m not fond of, so I gave most of it to Shoshanna. She had a rice dish with simmered pork. Both yummy!